One of the more popular gameplay comparisons to be bouncing around the
web today is the Crysis 2 vs Killzone 3 debate. And rightfully so, the
two games both in the same genre, and releasing in such close proximity
to one another are sure to have consumers debating which to choose when
facing a tough decision at the checkout line.
The latest comparison from Ahmad Dajani of VG Arabia details why Crysis 2 looks better than the PlayStation exclusive.
The latest comparison from Ahmad Dajani of VG Arabia details why Crysis 2 looks better than the PlayStation exclusive.
In the comparion, Dajani had this to say:
'Where Crysis 2 shines over Killzone 3 is in the impressive lighting
technology of the Cryengine 3. Crysis 2 lighting effects are the best I
have ever seen in a videogame. On top of that, Crysis 2 render more
light sources than any game on the market right now. Crysis 2 is leagues
beyond everything else out there.' - he continues.
"Each game has a different anti-aliasing method to get rid of the jaggies. Killzone 3 is using a Sony exclusive solution called MLAA while Crysis 2 is implementing temporal AA. Crytek said that their solution will give better result than Sony’s MLAA solution. What I can say right now is Crytek solution is variable."
Ultimately, "The campaign mode in Crysis 2 is more fun, much longer, and more repayable than Killzone 3 story mode." - he concluded.
"Each game has a different anti-aliasing method to get rid of the jaggies. Killzone 3 is using a Sony exclusive solution called MLAA while Crysis 2 is implementing temporal AA. Crytek said that their solution will give better result than Sony’s MLAA solution. What I can say right now is Crytek solution is variable."
Ultimately, "The campaign mode in Crysis 2 is more fun, much longer, and more repayable than Killzone 3 story mode." - he concluded.
No comments:
Post a Comment